woensdag 19 september 2012


Why do people and organizations do what they do?
Newton's First Law of Motion states that objects continue to move in a state of constant velocity unless acted upon by an external force. If there is a change in motion, therefore, there must be a force acting upon the object, and it is up to the physicist to find this force.  Similarly, an actor acts for a reason and it is up to the social scientist to find the  motivation for the actor’s moves.

In this blog entry I shall use two models to try and explain a company’s decision to have wind turbines; the rational actor model and the bounded rationality model.


  

The case is as follows; a big brewer decides to have wind turbines placed on in one of the company’s production sites. The motivation to do this is published in the company’s website:

Rational actor model
In the rational actor model, actions are intentional, they can to a certain extent be explained from the beliefs and desires of the actor. The action is optimal, given the actor’s beliefs about the world. These beliefs are supported (as well as possible) by evidence, which results from an optimal investment in information gathering. (Elster, Explaining social behaviour, 2007)

Why have wind turbines?
The company that decides to have wind turbines believes this is the best way to reduce its CO2 emission and at the same time improve its competitiveness. The first is supported by the evidence given; the placement of four wind turbines results in more CO2 emission reduction than the other options shown. The memo does not give any evidence how the wind turbines are improving the company’s competitiveness, this information may be considered confidential. (In their sustainability report the cost of wind energy is said to be close to the grid price, suggesting that it is a little above the grid price)

Why have wind turbines in their production site?
The memo gives good reasons for this choice; it is less expensive, it is more secure and it is approved of by the authorities.

Why have four wind turbines instead of three or five?
It is possible that four is the maximum for the size of the site, but if three had been the technical maximum, would the company have preferred the biogas plant? The memo only compares the potential CO2 reduction, not the investment required.

Why not purchase renewable energy instead of building wind turbines?
The same company’s brewery in ‘s Hertogenbosch decided to purchase green energy (8% of the total energy consumption) . The Zoeterwoude brewery could have done the same, but that option is not mentioned in the memo. Why is that? It is hard to believe that this option was not considered.

All the evidence presented supports the decision made. However, it all started with the will become a ‘greener’ company (like just about every other company in the Western world) and look for opportunities to achieve that goal. Once you desire to become ‘greener’, CO2 reduction is in the air.

Bounded reality at the organizational level
There are plenty of arguments for more sustainability (I will not go further into that) but you will see them only when you are willing to consider them. How does that happen? What is it that makes companies turn ‘green’? The bounded rationality model, applied at an organizational level (see Jones, 2003), can be used to explain this. This bounded rationality model focuses on six aspects, (which will be added in italics).

Organizations develop (more or less) standard reactions to certain types of stimuli (organizational memory). In many companies the first reactions to any idea will be questions such as; ‘will it generate a profit?’ and ‘Will it increase our sales’ or ‘What will be the return on investment?’ Sustainable ideas are no exception to this rule. They stand a much better chance if they are not only beneficial to the planet or the people but also to the company.  Renewable energy must have a trade off in terms of cost down or image up. Renewable energy from wind turbines on the brewery site may have both. Purchasing renewable energy may be a lot easier to arrange, but it is much less visible to the general public. The image effect will be nil.
In hard times for the company the management focus will be on survival. Sustainability will not be very high on the agenda (agenda setting). When all processes are under control and the company is making a decent profit, such plans stand a much better chance.

Once the idea of a sustainable plant has been embraced, different ideas for improvement may have been generated (parallel processing),offering a choice of options.

Once the wind turbine plan has been approved and launched this will require available resources in manpower and money, so that other ideas such as the biogas plant may have to wait till a later date (serial processing).

A project such as the wind turbines is not accepted solely on logical grounds. It can trigger positive and negative sensations (emotional contagion). Having a project like this may give the people involved a feeling of great achievement.

Employees of the brewery may feel a sense of pride of their company striving for a better future (identification), which may have a positive effect on their attitude.

Exercise; build an Environmental Management System
Last week we simulated the development of an Environmental Management System in class. We were divided into small groups representing different departments in a company. We were asked to develop a  vision of environmental excellence and to make  lists of both information that we needed from other departments and useful information that we could supply to other departments. I was in the production department.

It was not so difficult to agree on the vision of environmental excellence in a production department. Less waste and less energy consumption are core business for production. It was far more difficult to define de boundaries of our responsibility. In our opinion (based on the basic information we had) the company should diversify its business, but who is to decide on that?  Is it Production?

I work for a manufacturing company and similar discussions occur between the various departments. The result so far; other departments may advise but production is to decide.

One thing was clear from this exercise; the first step in starting an EMS is the definition on each party’s responsibilities.

Crying out in a wilderness of noise
I wonder if mentioning a brewery will increase the number of people reading my blog.




Geen opmerkingen:

Een reactie posten